dokidokipanic,

Your deviation, listed below, has been removed from deviantART due to a violation of our policies:

URL: [link]
Title: Spoilsbury Toast Boy -2
Submitted: 2005-11-20 3:23:17 pm

The administrator who deleted your deviation added the following:

Movie contains sexual imagery.

1. deviantART does not tolerate deviations which are based, in majority, off of racial slurs, are anti-semetic or derogatory in nature towards a particular religion or ethnic group, offensive in nature towards an individual or group of individuals, pornographic or are deemed invaluable to deviantART as decided by the deviantART staff on a case by case basis.

------------------------------------------------

This is quite suprising because there is a whole section devoted to nude photos and "fetish portraits" whether they're artistic or not. I'm sure I'm not the only one that finds pictures of this kind far more sexual and pornographic than a badly drawn beetle having his way with an old woman (which was a nightmarish vision, not a scene intended to arouse the viewer) anyway, I have presented 2 new short cartoons here for no one else but the great folks at devart for their conservative but fair ways.

cartoon 1 [link]
cartoon 2 [link]

place your bets! which will be removed first?

*update*

I'd like to thank MrGobi [link] for pointing out these 2 approved devart entries

[link]

[link]

....Oh wait, there's a little black box over the girl's cunt in one of those pictures - that makes it so it's not sexual or pornographic at all. It's like writing the word "fuck" but starring out a letter as if the meaning of the word is suddenly taken away.

*update* and yet more examples

[link] - a naked girl tied up with her pussy in full view (and no, it's not a drawing!)

[link] - this looks bizarre and painful